Arizona Supreme Court· 10/16/1975
Neal v. Hunt
Citations
- 541 P.2d 559
- 112 Ariz. 307
- 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding rumor that defendant had a water right claim was sufficient 25 to put the plaintiff on inquiry to ascertain if any adverse rights to the property existed
- unrecorded agreement between a prior owner and his vendee held not to be binding upon a subsequent purchaser for valuable consideration without notice
- “Constructive 12 and actual notice have the same effect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan, Jacobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-27· cited 23×
- Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-10-13· cited 23×
- In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water In the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 15×
- Warren v. Whitehall Income Fund 86Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-30· cited 14×
- Chesney v. United StatesD. Arizona· 1985-11-07· cited 12×
- Heatherwood Holdings, LLC v. First Commercial BankSupreme Court of Alabama· 2010-10-22· cited 11×
- Farmers Investment Company v. BettwyArizona Supreme Court· 1976-08-26· cited 10×
- Rowe v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-02-02· cited 9×
- Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-03-19· cited 8×
- West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-06-05· cited 6×
- Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-15· cited 3×
- Laurence v. KruckmeyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-11-16· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court· 1953-03-14· cited 73×
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1931-10-22· cited 73×
- Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court· 1946-05-20· cited 45×
- Howard v. PerrinArizona Supreme Court· 1904-03-26· cited 32×
- England v. Ally Ong HingArizona Supreme Court· 1969-09-29· cited 28×
- Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court· 1970-12-28· cited 23×
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1927-02-21· cited 23×
- Jarvis v. State Land Department, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-24· cited 20×
- Fourzan v. CurtisArizona Supreme Court· 1934-02-19· cited 20×
- Luke v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1910-04-02· cited 17×
- Arizona Land & Stock Co. v. MarkusArizona Supreme Court· 1931-02-18· cited 15×
- George v. GistArizona Supreme Court· 1928-01-07· cited 12×
- Brasher v. GibsonArizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-19· cited 11×
- Hill v. LenormandArizona Supreme Court· 1888-01-17· cited 10×
- Luke v. SmithSupreme Court· 1913-02-24· cited 9×
- England v. Ally Ong HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-02-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.