Luke v. Smith
Citations
- 227 U.S. 379
- 33 S. Ct. 356
- 57 L. Ed. 558
- 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2309
Syllabus
<p>The Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona having, in construing the recording statute, followed the decisions of the courts of Texas from whose laws the statute was copied, and held that one buying with notice that the holder of the legal title held it in trust for others took with notice notwithstanding the act, this court sees no reason for not following the general rule that it will follow the construction given by the local court to a local statute.</p> <p>Service of the complaint in an action brought to establish an equitable lien on property superior to the rights of all “parties defendant is notice to a defendant having knowledge of the suit.</p>
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neal v. HuntArizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-16· cited 20×
- In Re TomsSixth Circuit· 1939-02-14· cited 12×
- Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-11-19· cited 11×
- Blalak v. Mid Valley Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-08-26· cited 9×
- Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. HinchmanFirst Circuit· 1914-03-30· cited 6×
- Tuttle v. SmithSixth Circuit· 1939-02-14· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.