National Interstate Insurance v. Perro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the public interest is always served in the enforcement of valid restrictive covenants contained in lawful contracts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-12-19· cited 71×
• ALTA Analytics, Inc. v. Muuss
  S.D. Ohio· 1999-12-08· cited 21×
• D.J. Miller & Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-09-18· cited 7×
• Earley v. Executive Board of the United Transportation Union
  N.D. Ohio· 1997-01-31· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 887×
• Basicomputer Corp. v. Scott
  Sixth Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 313×
• Raimonde v. Van Vlerah
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1975-04-02· cited 222×
• Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 97×
• Dayton Christian Schools, Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-06-26· cited 30×
• Economou v. Physicians Weight Loss Centers of America
  N.D. Ohio· 1991-02-12· cited 23×
• Premix, Inc. v. Zappitelli
  N.D. Ohio· 1983-03-31· cited 18×
• Basicomputer Corp. v. Scott
  N.D. Ohio· 1991-12-26· cited 17×
• Dayton Christian Schools v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
  S.D. Ohio· 1984-01-06· cited 13×