Skip to main content
· 12/8/1999

ALTA Analytics, Inc. v. Muuss

Citations

  • 75 F. Supp. 2d 773
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19048
  • 1999 WL 1133526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the defendant employee subject to personal jurisdiction in Ohio based on his business-related travels to Ohio in an action for breach of a non-competition agreement
  • “the public interest is always served in the enforcement of valid restrictive covenants contained in lawful contracts.”
  • “the public interest is always served in the enforcement of valid restrictive covenants contained in lawful contracts.”
  • “[I]f the cause of action is for breach of that contract [with an Ohio resident] . . . then the cause of action naturally arises from the defendant’s activities in Ohio.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.