S.D. Ohio· 12/8/1999
ALTA Analytics, Inc. v. Muuss
Citations
- 75 F. Supp. 2d 773
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19048
- 1999 WL 1133526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the defendant employee subject to personal jurisdiction in Ohio based on his business-related travels to Ohio in an action for breach of a non-competition agreement
- “the public interest is always served in the enforcement of valid restrictive covenants contained in lawful contracts.”
- “the public interest is always served in the enforcement of valid restrictive covenants contained in lawful contracts.”
- “[I]f the cause of action is for breach of that contract [with an Ohio resident] . . . then the cause of action naturally arises from the defendant’s activities in Ohio.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marbley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-03-10· cited 108×
- Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCS.D. Ohio· 2008-06-20· cited 44×
- Ihf Ltd. v. Myra BagN.D. Ohio· 2019-06-13· cited 11×
- Retail Service Systems, Inc. v. Mattress By Appointment, LLCS.D. Ohio· 2016-09-28· cited 3×
- Whirlpool Corp. v. KingW.D. Michigan· 2003-06-04· cited 1×
- OnX USA LLC v. SciacchetanoN.D. Ohio· 2012-12-19· cited 1×
- Manufacturers Consolidation v. Rick RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-03-10
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,478×
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1968-09-20· cited 879×
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentSixth Circuit· 1996-07-22· cited 619×
- American Greetings Corporation v. Gerald A. CohnSixth Circuit· 1988-04-08· cited 276×
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-14· cited 268×
- John Welsh and Flo-Start, Inc. v. James W. GibbsSixth Circuit· 1980-10-02· cited 244×
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court· 1975-04-02· cited 222×
- Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-08-08· cited 209×
- In Re Delorean Motor CompanySixth Circuit· 1985-02-27· cited 205×
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzTenth Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 164×
- Marcia N. Cole, Representative of the Estate of Joseph E. Cole v. Nick J. MiletiSixth Circuit· 1998-01-08· cited 161×
- U.S. Sprint Communications Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Mr. K's Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-01-26· cited 154×
- First of Michigan Corporation Michael Sobol v. Carlton Bramlet Dolores M. BramletFirst Circuit· 1998-04-03· cited 153×
- Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.