· 6/5/1989
Nash v. AT&T NASSAU METALS
Citations
- 381 S.E.2d 206
- 298 S.C. 428
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employee Nash’s claim that Nassau deliberately and willfully deprived him of his benefits and terminated his employment was preempted because whether the actions were “illegal” involved a determination as to whether the parties complied with the employment contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.