Nash v. AT&T NASSAU METALS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee Nash’s claim that Nassau deliberately and willfully deprived him of his benefits and terminated his employment was preempted because whether the actions were “illegal” involved a determination as to whether the parties complied with the employment contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shipman v. Glenn
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 11×
• Lewis v. Local 382, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (AFL-CIO)
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-12· cited 5×
• Petty v. Mayor & Council of Baltimore
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-28· cited 2×
• Wright v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-06-20· cited 2×
• Lewis ex rel. Estate of Lewis v. Local 382, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
• Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
• Blair v. Allied Maintenance Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-05-20· cited 30×
• Butts v. AVX CORPORATION
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 19×
• Nash v. AT & T Nassau Metals
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-02· cited 3×