Skip to main content
· 6/5/1989

Nash v. AT&T NASSAU METALS

Citations

  • 381 S.E.2d 206
  • 298 S.C. 428
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employee Nash’s claim that Nassau deliberately and willfully deprived him of his benefits and terminated his employment was preempted because whether the actions were “illegal” involved a determination as to whether the parties complied with the employment contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.