Ninth Circuit· 5/8/2014
Nancy Graf v. Zynga Game Network, Inc.
Citations
- 750 F.3d 1098
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 16 “contents” under CIPA does not include customer record information such as name or address
- holding that the SCA “covers access to electronic information stored in third party computers”
- holding that, for the purposes of the ECPA, Congress intended \contents\ to refer only the message conveyed by the communication, and not to the record information generated in the course of the communication, such as the identities of the parties to the communication
- describing how \communications occur between [Internet] 'clients' and 'servers'\ in context of Facebook cookies transferring information
- assessing requirements of the Stored Communications Act, which incorporates the federal Wiretap Act’s definition of “contents”—“any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning of [a] communication,” see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(8), 2711(1
- affirming dismissal of federal wiretapping claims for transmission of “referer information”—i.¢. the page being viewed when a particular link was clicked and the Facebook name of the clicker—insofar as that information was not the “contents” of a communication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcón, Tallman, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-04-09· cited 176×
- David Tourgeman v. Collins Financial ServicesNinth Circuit· 2014-06-25· cited 94×
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationN.D. California· 2014-08-12· cited 88×
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-01-21· cited 76×
- Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.N.D. California· 2014-06-12· cited 47×
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationN.D. California· 2015-05-26· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. WaltersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-09-18· cited 33×
- Campbell v. Facebook Inc.N.D. California· 2014-12-23· cited 24×
- Svenson v. Google Inc.N.D. California· 2014-08-12· cited 15×
- Rosenfeld v. LenichE.D. New York· 2019-03-01· cited 12×
- Microsoft Corp. v. United States Department of JusticeW.D. Washington· 2017-02-08· cited 8×
- Campbell v. Facebook Inc.N.D. California· 2016-05-18· cited 8×
- In re Facebook Internet Tracking LitigationN.D. California· 2017-06-30· cited 6×
- In re Facebook Internet Tracking LitigationN.D. California· 2015-10-23· cited 5×
- In re the Search Warrant for [redacted].comC.D. California· 2017-03-31· cited 4×
- In re Google Referrer Header Privacy LitigationN.D. California· 2015-03-31· cited 3×
- Adam Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Sixth Circuit· 2025-06-25· cited 3×
- People v. EvensenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-27· cited 2×
- Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-10-16
- KATHLEEN VITA v. NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL (And a Consolidated Case)Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2024-10-24
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 1,097×
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 955×
- Marder v. LopezNinth Circuit· 2006-06-12· cited 520×
- City of Ontario v. QuonSupreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 233×
- United States v. ForresterNinth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 169×
- The Wilderness Society Alaska Center for the Environment v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceNinth Circuit· 2003-12-30· cited 168×
- United States v. ReedNinth Circuit· 2009-08-04· cited 136×
- Arakaki v. LingleNinth Circuit· 2007-02-08· cited 64×
- United States v. Rosa HernandezNinth Circuit· 2002-12-23· cited 60×
- Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-18· cited 55×
- Edwards v. First American Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-06-21· cited 46×
- Gilday v. DuboisFirst Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 46×
- Classic Media, Inc. v. MewbornNinth Circuit· 2008-07-11· cited 27×
- In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & Trap OnD. Massachusetts· 2005-10-25· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.