Nancy Graf v. Zynga Game Network, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 16 “contents” under CIPA does not include customer record information such as name or address
• holding that the SCA “covers access to electronic information stored in third party computers”
• holding that, for the purposes of the ECPA, Congress intended \contents\ to refer only the message conveyed by the communication, and not to the record information generated in the course of the communication, such as the identities of the parties to the communication
• describing how \communications occur between [Internet] 'clients' and 'servers'\ in context of Facebook cookies transferring information
• assessing requirements of the Stored Communications Act, which incorporates the federal Wiretap Act’s definition of “contents”—“any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning of [a] communication,” see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(8), 2711(1
• affirming dismissal of federal wiretapping claims for transmission of “referer information”—i.¢. the page being viewed when a particular link was clicked and the Facebook name of the clicker—insofar as that information was not the “contents” of a communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).