Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/15/1983
Nancy E.M. v. Kenneth D.M.
Citations
- 462 A.2d 1386
- 316 Pa. Super. 351
- 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ordering visitation at desire of 17-year-old child is tantamount to denying a parent’s visitation rights
- stating, “in the context of custody proceedings, ‘[h]ostilities between the [parties] are relevant only insofar as they constitute a threat to the child or affect the child’s welfare’”
- hostilities between the parents are relevant only insofar as they constitute a threat to the child or affect the child’s welfare
- hostilities between the parents are relevant only insofar as they constitute a threat to the child or affect the child’s welfare
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Brosky and Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- K.T. v. L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-17· cited 75×
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-31· cited 38×
- Andrews v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-26· cited 37×
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-28· cited 15×
- Hamel v. HamelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-21· cited 14×
- In re the Marriage of KimbrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-09-16· cited 14×
- In Re Mary Kathryn T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-09· cited 10×
- Somers v. SomersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-19· cited 10×
- Niadna v. NiadnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-14· cited 6×
- K.T. & M.T. v. L.S. f/k/a L.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-17
- Sharman v. NagleBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-07-02
- West v. WestBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-10-31
- Nowotarski v. MatzBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-06-07
- Seidel v. FeltenbergerBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-06-30
- Brugger v. BruggerBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2004-02-03
- Kuntz v. AllenCarbon County Court of Common Pleas· 1987-12-09
- Aceti v. DinoskiMonroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-06-13
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 224×
- Scarlett v. ScarlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 64×
- Garrity v. GarritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-27· cited 55×
- Tomlinson v. TomlinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 53×
- In Re Custody of WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-28· cited 46×
- In Re LeskovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 43×
- Martin v. SoblotneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-14· cited 39×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Newcomer v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-25· cited 37×
- Hugo v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-06-12· cited 35×
- Fernald v. FernaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-27· cited 32×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Oxenreider v. OxenreiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-14· cited 30×
- Robert H. H. v. May L. H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-26· cited 29×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Peterson v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-28· cited 27×
- Lewis v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-11-16· cited 26×
- Haraschak v. HaraschakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-20· cited 26×
- Jones v. FloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-14· cited 24×
- Sweeney v. SweeneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-28· cited 19×
- McAnallen v. McAnallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-04· cited 16×
- Kimmey v. KimmeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-07· cited 15×
- Wenger v. WengerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.