Skip to main content
· 3/3/1989

Nan Ya Plastics Corp. U.S.A. v. DeSantis

Citations

  • 377 S.E.2d 388
  • 237 Va. 255
  • 5 Va. Law Rep. 1783
  • 1989 Va. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that personal jurisdiction over a Texas defendant was proper where an employment contract was formed in Virginia although the entire contract was to be performed in Texas
  • finding personal jurisdiction where defendant reached into Virginia and the contract was formed in Virginia
  • emphasizing in finding jurisdiction that contract formed upon plaintiffs receipt of letter in Virginia
  • burden of proof to establish impossibility of performance of contract is on party who asserts it
  • contract negotiations by telephone with Virginia plaintiff, written communications mailed to and contract formation in Virginia
  • cited extensively by plaintiff and finding that jurisdiction was proper where the disputed contract was formed in Virginia, and because “Nan Ya aggressively reached into Virginia and recruited a Virginia resident”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.