· 3/3/1989
Nan Ya Plastics Corp. U.S.A. v. DeSantis
Citations
- 377 S.E.2d 388
- 237 Va. 255
- 5 Va. Law Rep. 1783
- 1989 Va. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that personal jurisdiction over a Texas defendant was proper where an employment contract was formed in Virginia although the entire contract was to be performed in Texas
- finding personal jurisdiction where defendant reached into Virginia and the contract was formed in Virginia
- emphasizing in finding jurisdiction that contract formed upon plaintiffs receipt of letter in Virginia
- burden of proof to establish impossibility of performance of contract is on party who asserts it
- contract negotiations by telephone with Virginia plaintiff, written communications mailed to and contract formation in Virginia
- cited extensively by plaintiff and finding that jurisdiction was proper where the disputed contract was formed in Virginia, and because “Nan Ya aggressively reached into Virginia and recruited a Virginia resident”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.