Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a Pennsylvania-based buyer was not subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Virginia solely because the seller was in Virginia and shipped the goods from Virginia
• relying entirely on due process analysis, rather than statutory analysis, to limit the reach of the Long Arm Statute where nonresident contracted for the manufacture of goods by a Virginia firm, but otherwise had no contact with Virginia
• nonresident purchaser did not have minimum contacts with Virginia, even though it ordered plywood panels from a Virginia company, for delivery F.O.B. Danville, Virginia
• “The purpose of our ‘long arm statute’ is to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.”
• “The purpose of our ‘long arm statute’ is to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.”
• “The purpose of our ‘long arm statute’ is to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).