Supreme Court· 6/13/1988
N. W. Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas
Citations
- 486 U.S. 1059
- 108 S. Ct. 2830
- 100 L. Ed. 2d 930
- 56 U.S.L.W. 3849
- 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 is rationally related to the objective of protecting public health and welfare by implementing stiff and certain penalties for those who violate federal drug laws
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 is rationally related to the objective of protecting public health and welfare by implementing stiff and certain penalties for those who violate federal drug laws
- “[A] statute [that] does not discriminate on racial grounds or against a suspect class ... will be sustained in the absence of persuasive evidence that Congress had no reasonable basis for drawing the lines it did”
- involving Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
- mandatory minimum under § 841(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, Certiorari, Conviction
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-06-21· cited 199×
- United States v. Riley Harrington Keller, Iii, Millard Lee Smith, Jr.Eleventh Circuit· 1990-11-02· cited 198×
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellSeventh Circuit· 1990-05-02· cited 196×
- United States v. Crescenciano M. PenaTenth Circuit· 1990-12-04· cited 187×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1993-07-26· cited 174×
- United States v. Reginald Sinclair BucknerEighth Circuit· 1990-01-22· cited 143×
- United States v. Zulquarnan KhanNinth Circuit· 1993-05-11· cited 143×
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 142×
- Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesThird Circuit· 1992-10-23· cited 126×
- United States v. Edward J. ElkinsEleventh Circuit· 1989-09-29· cited 121×
- United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykFirst Circuit· 1989-07-07· cited 113×
- United States v. Simon Edward Heath and Paul Sau-Ki ChengFifth Circuit· 1992-09-29· cited 110×
- United States v. Willis Walter Hamblin, Gregory JonesEleventh Circuit· 1990-10-11· cited 103×
- Alan H. Brader v. Allegheny General Hospital George J. Magovern, and Daniel L. DiamondThird Circuit· 1995-09-01· cited 102×
- R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc., Celestial Seasonings, Inc., and Kraft, Inc.Second Circuit· 1989-01-17· cited 99×
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockTenth Circuit· 1992-05-15· cited 99×
- United States v. Leo KleinNinth Circuit· 1988-11-04· cited 95×
- United States v. Lawrence J. KidderNinth Circuit· 1989-03-15· cited 90×
- United States v. Luis A. Martinez, Alexis Miranda Ortiz, Also Known as Alexis PachecoSecond Circuit· 1993-03-08· cited 77×
- United States v. Jerry D. Smith, Paul D. Smith, and G. Michael KirchoffNinth Circuit· 1989-12-04· cited 76×
Other cases named N. W. Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.