Skip to main content
· 9/26/1990

Myers v. McHenry

Citations

  • 580 A.2d 860
  • 398 Pa. Super. 100
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • broker’s misrepresentations properly admitted, despite integration clause in sales agreement, where well’s flow rate was not readily ascertainable
  • whether party unjustifiably relied upon misrepresentation “should be decided by a jury on the basis of all of the facts and permissible inferences which may be drawn from the evidence presented at trial.”
  • “[t]he question of whether a party’s reliance upon a representation was justifiable is one that should be decided by a jury on the basis of all the facts and permissible inferences which may be drawn from the evidence presented at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Montemuro, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.