· 9/26/1990
Myers v. McHenry
Citations
- 580 A.2d 860
- 398 Pa. Super. 100
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- broker’s misrepresentations properly admitted, despite integration clause in sales agreement, where well’s flow rate was not readily ascertainable
- whether party unjustifiably relied upon misrepresentation “should be decided by a jury on the basis of all of the facts and permissible inferences which may be drawn from the evidence presented at trial.”
- “[t]he question of whether a party’s reliance upon a representation was justifiable is one that should be decided by a jury on the basis of all the facts and permissible inferences which may be drawn from the evidence presented at trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Montemuro, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.