Baker v. Cambridge Chase, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presence of an integration clause is not determinative where fraud is alleged
• stating that “restitution often goes with rescission, and should not be characterized as damages”
• excluding parol evidence “[w]here the alleged prior or contemporaneous oral representations or agreement concern a subject which is specifically dealt with within the written contract, and the written contract covers or purports to cover the entire agreement of the parties”
• “It is well known that the purpose of equitable recission is to return the parties as nearly as possible to their original positions where warranted by the circumstances of the transaction.”
• “It is well known that the purpose of equitable recission is to return the parties as nearly as possible to their original positions where warranted by the circumstances of the transaction.”
• “Rescission is an equitable remedy, to be granted only where the parties to a contract can be placed in their former positions with regard to the subject matter of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).