Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 3/16/2001
Myers v. Kim
Citations
- 55 Pa. D. & C.4th 93
- 2001 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a nonparty may be bound if his interests are adequately represented by someone with the same interest who is a party”
- “a nonparty may be bound if his interests are adequately represented by someone with the same interest who is a party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 565×
- Bruszewski v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1950-04-11· cited 287×
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-27· cited 207×
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Celotex Corporation and U.S. Mineral Products Company, Dana CorporationSecond Circuit· 1995-06-05· cited 180×
- Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-10-23· cited 159×
- Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 137×
- Shaffer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-28· cited 132×
- Witkowski v. WelchSecond Circuit· 1999-04-12· cited 131×
- Kingston Coal Co. v. Felton Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-21· cited 107×
- James A. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1990-03-23· cited 77×
- Ammon v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-10· cited 57×
- Bezanson v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (In re Medomak Canning)First Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 41×
- Stevens Painton Corp. v. First State InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-01· cited 38×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-15· cited 29×
- Maranc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-03· cited 26×
- Tandon v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-10· cited 24×
- Phillips v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.S.D. New York· 1990-07-24· cited 18×
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanE.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-01-16· cited 15×
- Kean v. FormanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-04· cited 12×
- Jack Moldovan v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Third Circuit· 1986-05-13· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.