Skip to main content
· 3/23/1990

James A. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 896 F.2d 979
  • 22 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 846
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4117
  • 1990 WL 20749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he preclusive effect of a bankruptcy decree must reflect the reality of its limited jurisdiction.\
  • non-party is in privity with party for res judicata purposes if nonparty has succeeded to party's interest in property, if nonparty controlled prior litigation, or if party adequately represented nonparty's interest in the prior proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Smith, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.