Skip to main content

Murray v. State

Citations

  • 245 S.W.3d 37
  • 2007 WL 4462745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Hardy did not decide any issue with respect to medical records generally
  • explaining that drug-testing policy was invalidated in Ferguson because immediate objective of searches was to generate evidence for law enforcement purposes
  • “Because we have concluded that Hardy remains binding on this Court, absent contrary guidance or instruction from the court of criminal appeals, we are compelled to follow the existing case law on this precise issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Puryear, Pemberton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.