Murray v. Murray
Citations
- 80 Pa. Super. 573
- 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 210
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Alimony and counsel fees pendente lite — Discharge of rule — Discretion of court.</p> <p>An application for an order for alimony and counsel fees is addressed to the discretion of the court, having jurisdiction of the cause, and in the exercise of this discretion regard is to be had to the'husband’s ability to pay and the wife’s necessity.</p> <p>The opinion of the trial judge that the libellant would fail in her suit was not sufficient reason to discharge a rule for such alimony and counsel fees, and the entry of such an order was not exercise of the sound discretion of the court.</p>
Judges: Gawthrop, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Porter, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-05· cited 48×
- Williamson v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-15· cited 43×
- Hanson v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-01-14· cited 27×
- Brady v. BradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-04-10· cited 25×
- Roughsedge v. RoughsedgeLuzerne County Court of Common Pleas· 1944-06-20
- Black v. BlackPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1950-03-13
- Simpson v. SimpsonPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1954-12-04
- Guilder v. GunderFranklin County Court of Common Pleas· 1948-06-18
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.