Murray v. Murray
Citations
- 78 Pa. Super. 443
- 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Alimony pendente lite — Interlocutory order — Appeals.</p> <p>No appeal lies from an order refusing to allow counsel fees and alimony pendente lite. Such an order is in no sense final and is wholly interlocutory. It can be excepted to, but cannot be reviewed until a final decree has been entered in the divorce proceedings and the appeal is properly before the Superior Court.</p>
Judges: Henderson, Keller, Linn, Orlady, Porter, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-04-19· cited 31×
- Lynn v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-12-13· cited 25×
- Appeal of PowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-05-07· cited 24×
- Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1866-07-01· cited 18×
- Biddle v. BiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-04-15· cited 6×
- Rieder v. RiederSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-11-19· cited 4×
- Tobin v. TobinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-12-10· cited 3×
- Walsh v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-12-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.