District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/27/1990
Murray v. Briggs
Citations
- 569 So. 2d 476
- 1990 WL 139625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to use federal regulation that was “vague and general” to “control state law questions of negligence by enlarging common law duties or creating new duties”
- declining to use federal regulation that was “vague and general” to “control state law questions of negligence by enlarging common law duties or creating new duties”
- “At the very least, any regulation that purports to establish a duty of reasonable care must be specific. One that sets out only a general or abstract standard of care cannot establish negligence.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aspen v. BaylessSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-07-26· cited 58×
- State of Texas v. United States of America, and Interstate Commerce CommissionFifth Circuit· 1989-03-06· cited 51×
- Short v. Spring Creek Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 49×
- Stong v. Freeman Truck Line, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1984-09-26· cited 40×
- Cadillac Fairview of Florida, Inc. v. CespedesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-30· cited 36×
- Fagerquist v. Western Sun Aviation, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1987-04-29· cited 36×
- Florida Freight Terminals, Inc. v. CabanasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-01-24· cited 30×
- Mrs. David B. Wallace, Sr., and David B. Wallace, Sr. v. William Dale Ener and T. M. KellumFifth Circuit· 1975-10-20· cited 28×
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-02-18· cited 25×
- Garcia v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-04-10· cited 23×
- R. E. King and W. J. Tennille, a Partnership Doing Business as Southern Crop Service v. Avtech Aviation, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1981-09-04· cited 21×
- Banat v. ArmandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-12· cited 19×
- California Trucking Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionNinth Circuit· 1990-04-13· cited 16×
- American Indem. Co. v. ComeauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-11· cited 14×
- Hageman v. TSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-07-13· cited 10×
- RD JACKSON v. Harsco Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-14· cited 8×
- Gaar v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 8×
- Taylor v. Pennsylvania RailroadD. Delaware· 1965-10-13· cited 6×
- Frost v. Quatraine Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-25· cited 2×
- Garcia v. RiveraNew York Supreme Court· 1989-03-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.