Skip to main content

Murray v. Briggs

Citations

  • 569 So. 2d 476
  • 1990 WL 139625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to use federal regulation that was “vague and general” to “control state law questions of negligence by enlarging common law duties or creating new duties”
  • declining to use federal regulation that was “vague and general” to “control state law questions of negligence by enlarging common law duties or creating new duties”
  • “At the very least, any regulation that purports to establish a duty of reasonable care must be specific. One that sets out only a general or abstract standard of care cannot establish negligence.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.