Aspen v. Bayless

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may recover costs when the funds used to pay the costs were furnished by a third person without any obligation of repayment
• holding that party is not precluded from recovering costs under former version of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 where someone other than named party pays or advances those costs
• recognizing that “[a]fter an insurance company has paid a loss on behalf of its insured, it is entitled to subrogation either by express contract rights, or by equitable subrogation by operation of law” (quoting Hough v. Huffman, 555 So. 2d 942, 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990))
• a party is not precluded from recovering costs under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, or after judgment in its favor, when someone other than named party pays those costs
• fact that insurer paid costs did not preclude recovery under offer of judgment statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).