Murphy v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We choose to follow the majority of state and federal courts that have held Wicker is the better standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chacon v. Union Pacific Railroad
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-10-26
• June Fisher, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Alan Fisher v. BNSF Railway Company, (Individually and as Successor-In Interest to the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, Atchison and Quincy Railroad Company, Burlington Northern, Inc., and Burlington Northern Railroad Company)
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-07-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 257×
• Wicker v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1998-04-29· cited 74×
• Caplener v. Bluebonnet Milling Co.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-12-18· cited 45×
• Richardson v. Union Pacific Railroad
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-09-28· cited 16×
• Blevins v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-04-07· cited 13×
• Oliverio v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  New York Supreme Court· 2006-10-24· cited 10×
• Babbitt v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-01-02· cited 9×