· 9/28/2011
Richardson v. Union Pacific Railroad
Citations
- 386 S.W.3d 77
- 2011 Ark. App. 562
- 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 602
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the binding precedent from Johnson and Kingrey that such an error is palpable resulting in manifest injustice
- extending the holding in Martin, 409 S.W.3d at 346, to sentencing-phase instructions
- “[A]ll unanimous verdict violations constitute palpable error resulting in manifest injustice[]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agree, Hart, Pittman, Robbins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.