Murphy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in the context of a post-conviction action that “[t]he UPCPA provides a forum for known grievances, not an opportunity to research for grievances”
• “ ‘Fishing expedition’ discovery should not be allowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Azad Haji Abdullah
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
• Alisha Ann Murphy v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 75×
• Kent Hall v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-03-17· cited 11×
• Schultz v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30· cited 7×
• Tyrell Ramsey v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2015-12-31· cited 6×
• Hall v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-22· cited 6×
• Christopher Ray Schultz
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 5×
• Edward Stevens v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-12-10· cited 5×
• Miguel C. Joyner v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 5×
• Clayton Robert Adams v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-11-04· cited 5×
• Daniel Chippewa v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-08-13· cited 4×
• Cullen R. Sims v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2015-08-24· cited 3×
• James Dee Olsen v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-08-13· cited 3×
• Jimmy D. Leytham v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-08-10· cited 2×
• Marc Edward Klein v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-07-02· cited 1×
• Christopher Ray Schultz v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21
• Post-conviction
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30
• Larry Severson v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-10-10
• Hall v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-03-22