Murphy v. Korea Asset Management Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the same in regards to the Korea Asset Management Corporation because the Republic of Korea had the power to appoint its auditor, through which it exercised control over its decision making

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
  Second Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 104×
• Kirschenbaum v. 650 Fifth Avenue
  S.D. New York· 2017-06-29· cited 7×
• European Community v. RJR NABISCO, INC.
  E.D. New York· 2011-05-13· cited 6×
• Ocean Line Holdings Ltd. v. China National Chartering Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2008-09-26· cited 2×
• Murphy v. Korea Asset Management Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2006-07-06· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Saudi Arabia v. Nelson
  Supreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 711×
• Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson
  Supreme Court· 2003-04-22· cited 464×
• Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee of Receivers
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 149×
• Virtual Countries, Inc. v. Republic of South Africa, a Foreign State, and South African Tourism Board, an Agency or Instrumentality of a Foreign State
  Second Circuit· 2002-08-07· cited 94×
• Robinson v. Government of Malaysia
  Second Circuit· 2001-10-11· cited 39×
• EIE Guam Corp. v. Long Term Credit Bank of Japan, Ltd.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-02-27· cited 23×

Other cases named Murphy v. Korea Asset Management Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Murphy v. Korea Asset Management Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2006-07-06· cited 1×