Murphy v. Kmart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding affidavits are merely statements of fact, and thus, not protected
• “The party asserting the work product privilege to resist disclosure bears the burden of providing a factual basis for asserting the privilege.”
• third-party witness statements did not reflect the legal strategies of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ford Motor Co. v. Edgewood Properties, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2009-05-19· cited 36×
• American Oversight v. U.S. Dep't of Just.
  Second Circuit· 2022-08-16· cited 23×
• Martensen v. Koch
  D. Colorado· 2014-07-29· cited 17×
• Bell v. Lackawanna County
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-31· cited 12×
• Boyer v. Gildea
  N.D. Indiana· 2009-01-29· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hickman v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 2,115×
• Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 204×
• Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-09-16· cited 199×
• Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-04-14· cited 137×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 134×
• In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1973-02-12· cited 103×
• Erik Gundacker v. Unisys Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-08-07· cited 65×
• St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.
  N.D. Iowa· 2000-12-19· cited 40×
• Infosystems, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 2000-11-17· cited 20×
• In re Convergent Technologies Second Half 1984 Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 1988-10-28· cited 20×
• Schipp Ex Rel. Estate of Neufelder v. General Motors Corp.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2006-10-05· cited 12×
• Dobbs v. Lamonts Apparel, Inc.
  D. Alaska· 1994-03-23· cited 9×