Murphy v. Green
Citations
- 48 Pa. Super. 1
- 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330
Syllabus
<p>Ground, rents — Nonpayment for fifty years — Payments and promises to pay — Redeemable and irredeemable ground rents — Acts of April 27,1855, P. L. 868, and June 24,1885, P. L. 161.</p> <p>1. Where no payments were made of a ground rent from the time of its creation in 1849, until 1900, and then the owners of the ground paid the rent from 1900 to 1906, and the ground landlord received the same, and the owners represented that the ground rent was valid and subsisting and that they would thereafter pay the same, and it was purchased by the plaintiff as such, the fact that no payment was made from 1849 to 1900 does not extinguish the original ground rent, and the ground owners who agreed to pay and did pay the rent from 1900 to 1906 and their successors in title cannot enforce a claim to redeem the rent as a redeemable ground rent under the Act of June 24,1885, P. L. 161. Nor can they be heard to say that the ground rent has become extinguished and irrecoverable.</p> <p>2. In such a case even if the irredeemable ground rent had been extinguished by the nonpayment of it for fifty years still the ground owners who made the promises to pay and made the payments and their successors in title are estopped from denying that the ground rent which had been purchased on the strength of the recorded deed creating it and the promises to pay and the payments from 1900 to 1906, was a valid and subsisting irredeemable ground rent.</p> <p>3. Where suit is brought in such a case to enforce the payment of ground rent accruing after such payments made the twenty-one years referred to in the Act of April 27, 1855, P. L. 368, are the twenty-one years next preceding the bringing of the suit.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court· 1902-04-07· cited 183×
- Putnam v. TylerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-01-03· cited 27×
- Miller's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1877-06-18· cited 15×
- Duff v. WynkoopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1874-01-05· cited 12×
- Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-10-27· cited 12×
- Maple v. KussartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-01-07· cited 10×
- Korn v. BrowneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1870-01-10· cited 10×
- Griffiths v. Sears ex rel. PerotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1886-05-10· cited 10×
- Clay v. IsemingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-07-21· cited 10×
- Appeal of WingettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-10-22· cited 9×
- Clay v. McCreanorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-02-17· cited 8×
- Wallace v. Fourth U. P. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-01-03· cited 6×
- Biddle v. HoovenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-04-30· cited 4×
- Barber v. LefavourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-15· cited 3×
- Heiss v. BanisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-15· cited 3×
- Wilkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1849-09-15· cited 2×
- Hiester v. ShaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1863-07-01· cited 2×
- Cadwalader v. SpringsteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-04-20· cited 2×
- Graham & Co. v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1863-07-01· cited 1×
- Meek's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-04-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.