Mumblow v. Monroe Broadcasting, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Louisiana law, courts “look to the parties’ intent to determine the terms of an oral agreement . . .” (citing, inter alia, La. Civ. Code art. 2045)
• “‘[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary,’ and we simply apply the law of the forum state.”
• “[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “‘[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice- of-law analysis is necessary,’ and [courts] simply apply the law of the forum state.” (quoting reference omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).