Fifth Circuit· 2/28/2005

Mumblow v. Monroe Broadcasting, Inc.

Citations

401 F.3d 616
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3402
2005 WL 459243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that, under Louisiana law, courts “look to the parties’ intent to determine the terms of an oral agreement . . .” (citing, inter alia, La. Civ. Code art. 2045)
“‘[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary,’ and we simply apply the law of the forum state.”
“[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
“‘[I]f the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice- of-law analysis is necessary,’ and [courts] simply apply the law of the forum state.” (quoting reference omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Smith, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.