Skip to main content

Mulvihill v. Spinnato

Citations

  • 228 Conn. App. 781

Syllabus

The defendant appealed from the trial court's judgment denying her special motion to dismiss the plaintiff's defamation action pursuant to the anti- SLAPP statute (§ 52-196a), claiming that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff met his burden under § 52-196a of establishing probable cause that he would prevail on the merits of his complaint. Held: The trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, this court having concluded that, viewing the pleadings and affidavits of the parties in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the plaintiff satisfied the relatively minimal burden under § 52-196a of establishing probable cause that he would prevail on the merits of his complaint. Argued April 16—officially released October 22, 2024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • 67 Conn. L. Rptr. 750, 755 n.4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elgo; Moll; Seeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.