Mulvihill v. Spinnato
Citations
- 228 Conn. App. 781
Syllabus
The defendant appealed from the trial court's judgment denying her special motion to dismiss the plaintiff's defamation action pursuant to the anti- SLAPP statute (§ 52-196a), claiming that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff met his burden under § 52-196a of establishing probable cause that he would prevail on the merits of his complaint. Held: The trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, this court having concluded that, viewing the pleadings and affidavits of the parties in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the plaintiff satisfied the relatively minimal burden under § 52-196a of establishing probable cause that he would prevail on the merits of his complaint. Argued April 16—officially released October 22, 2024
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 67 Conn. L. Rptr. 750, 755 n.4
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elgo; Moll; Seeley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Aguilar v. EickConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-08-12· cited 3×
- Cator v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-12-10
- Pryor v. BrignoleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-04-01
- Khan v. Jewish Women InternationalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-30
- Kaufman v. SynnottConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-30
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 1,138×
- Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-08-01· cited 744×
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-17· cited 235×
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-03· cited 171×
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-18· cited 164×
- Mindys Cosmetics, Inc. v. DakarNinth Circuit· 2010-07-06· cited 102×
- United States v. KhounsavanhFirst Circuit· 1997-05-16· cited 101×
- Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-06· cited 89×
- Tryon v. Town of North BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-11· cited 81×
- State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-06· cited 77×
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-20· cited 66×
- City of New Haven v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-18· cited 46×
- United States v. Antwone Miguel SandersSixth Circuit· 2024-06-28· cited 37×
- American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. ZehSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-10-19· cited 37×
- Egri v. FoisieConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-08· cited 36×
- N.C. Dep't of Transp. v. Mission Battleground Park, DSTSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-02· cited 19×
- John P. Thurlow v. Zakia C. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2021-11-23· cited 16×
- People's United Bank v. KudejConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-27· cited 11×
- Mohabeer v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.