Mullins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant's act of \swallow[ing] the crack cocaine which otherwise would have been used as evidence in a possession charge\ was sufficient to support his conviction for obstruction of justice
• holding that the defendant’s act of “swallow[ing] the crack cocaine which otherwise would have been used as evidence in a possession charge” was sufficient to support his conviction for obstruction of justice
• “We look instead to the evidence favorable to the judgment, along with any inferences reasonably drawn therefrom. We will affirm a judgment that is supported by substantial evidence of probative value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-07· cited 18×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-14· cited 17×
• Charles A. Clark v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-09-10
• Michael Thompson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-10-24
• Brenda Conley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-05-06

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Morales
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-03· cited 44×
• State v. Jennings
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-10-19· cited 36×
• Vaillancourt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-05-22· cited 30×