Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 747 N.E.2d 623
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 750
  • 2001 WL 474554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that any error in the exclusion of defendant’s evidence was harmless where there was substantial independent evidence to support the conviction
  • any error in Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 48A02-1404-CR-228 |February 19, 2015 Page 13 of 23 exclusion of defendant’s proffered 911 tapes was harmless where there was substantial independent evidence to support convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Najam, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.