Skip to main content

Mullins v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 210
  • 1997 Ky. LEXIS 147
  • 1997 WL 721674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contempt finding requires evidence of a present, willful violation and may not be based on generalized disapproval of past conduct
  • holding that a contempt finding requires evidence of a present, willful violation and may not be based on generalized disapproval of past conduct
  • highlighting that procedural due process requires fairness in legal proceedings
  • highlighting that procedural due process requires fairness in legal proceedings
  • “Whether to admit or exclude evidence to ensure the fairness of a trial is within the discretion of -5- the trial court, and its determination will not be overturned on appeal in the absence of a showing of an abuse of such discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Lambert, Only, Stephens, Stumbo, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.