Mullen v. Mullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while “a trial court has broad discretion in valuing a retirement account, the trial court must arrive at an appropriate figure without merely resorting to an estimation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20· cited 33×
• Bardowell v. Bardowell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-05· cited 23×
• Mondello v. Torres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 23×
• Brown v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-17· cited 1×
• Stephens v. Stephens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-18
• Joshua S. Winegar v. Gabrielle D. Winegar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gentile v. Gentile
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-01· cited 54×
• Moon v. Moon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 33×
• Nicewonder v. Nicewonder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-28· cited 16×