Muench v. Israel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the procedural requirements, or the lack thereof, are carried over from the prior section [455]”
• although motion was untimely, court addresses issue anyway because there is authority that § 455(b) is mandatory and can not be circumvented by a claim of untimeliness
• “[T]he Seventh Circuit has indicated by way of dictum that the issue of recusal under section 455(b) should not be circumvented by a claim of untimeliness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).