In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that timeliness is required under § 455, without delineating between subsections (a) and (b)
• concluding that “[ejven if [the rulings] were deemed to be incorrect, it ... does not follow that they were motivated by personal bias”
• finding that adverse rulings do not “per se create the appearance of bias under section 455(a)”
• noting that the determination of disqualification under subsection (b)(1) “should be made on the basis of conduct extrajudicial in nature as distinguished from conduct within a judicial context”
• granting recusal motion after years of then unresolved litigation involving \technical\ issues would be \catastrophic\
• granting recusal motion after years of then unresolved litigation involving “technical” issues would be “catastrophic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).