Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 2/28/2018

Muckrock, LLC v. Cent. Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 300 F. Supp. 3d 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that FOIA requester with “pending requests for emails that ha[ve] not been denied yet but would be denied based on this policy” had standing to bring policy 11 or practice claim
  • noting that the role of the court is to evaluate only “the appropriateness of the methods used to carry out the search” (citation omitted)
  • finding that the CIA had employed an unlawful FOIA policy based on its identical response to four similar requests for email records
  • entering summary judgment for the plaintiff when the Court found “there [was] no genuine dispute that the CIA has employed a policy” that “violates the FOIA”
  • granting summary judgment for the plaintiff on a policy-or-practice claim based on undisputed evidence that the defendant had refused to process at least twelve FOIA requests pursuant to the alleged policy
  • granting summary judgment for the plaintiff on a policy-or-practice claim based on undisputed evidence that the defendant had refused to process at least twelve FOIA requests pursuant to the alleged policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.