Tenth Circuit· 8/15/2018
Muathe v. Fleming
Citations
- 899 F.3d 1140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Ehrenhaus factors must be considered for both Rule 41(b) dismissals and dismissals made pursuant to the court’s inherent authority
- recognizing in Rule 11 context that “[t]he proper procedure for determining a reasonable attorneys’ fee is to arrive at a lodestar figure by multiplying the hours plaintiff’s counsel reasonably spent on the litigation by a reasonable hourly rate.” (citation omitted)
- finding failure to retract manipulated documents sufficient reason to find plaintiff’s conduct culpable, hence “bolstering its decision to apply a dismissal sanction.”
- first three factors aid court in deciding whether to apply any sanctions, and last two “inform on whether dismissal or lesser sanction is appropriate”
- “The injured party [in the Rule 11 context] has a duty to mitigate costs by not overstaffing, overresearching or overdiscovering clearly meritless claims.”
- a court 16 abuses its discretion if its discovery or sanctions order is based on an erroneous view of the law (citing Cooter & Gell, 496 U.S. at 405)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matheson, Phillips, McHugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 9,468×
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 2,202×
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsTenth Circuit· 2007-07-03· cited 1,887×
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 955×
- Ramos v. LammTenth Circuit· 1983-06-15· cited 753×
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-14· cited 734×
- Koch v. City of Del CityTenth Circuit· 2011-11-02· cited 409×
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1990-07-19· cited 337×
- George C. Jones, Jr., and Peggy Linn Jones v. Lee Thompson, A/K/A Morris Lee ThompsonTenth Circuit· 1993-06-22· cited 245×
- Smith v. City of Enid Ex Rel. Enid City CommissionTenth Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 244×
- Xyngular, Corp. v. SchenkelTenth Circuit· 2018-05-15· cited 230×
- ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Tenth Circuit· 2012-10-11· cited 229×
- Lippoldt v. ColeTenth Circuit· 2006-11-07· cited 214×
- Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsTenth Circuit· 1992-05-29· cited 205×
- Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2005-03-29· cited 199×
- Roth v. GreenTenth Circuit· 2006-10-30· cited 120×
- Praseuth v. Rubbermaid, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2005-05-11· cited 83×
- LaFleur v. Teen HelpTenth Circuit· 2003-09-03· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.