Skip to main content
· 5/11/2005

Praseuth v. Rubbermaid, Inc.

Citations

  • 406 F.3d 1245
  • 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1197
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8260
  • 2005 WL 1112085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a prevailing party on “an ADA claim is permitted recovery of attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses”
  • “When counsel is inexperienced, a losing party should not be obligated to pay for that counsel’s legal education.”
  • “[A] “judge is not obligated to accept the fee applicant's billing judgment uncritically.”
  • analyzing the attorneys’ fees awarded to a prevailing employment plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McConnell, McKay, Friot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.