Skip to main content

Moxley v. Moxley

Citations

  • 638 S.E.2d 284
  • 281 Ga. 326
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3559
  • 2006 Ga. LEXIS 987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision to admit or exclude evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion
  • “The test for reversible error under those circumstances is whether there is a reasonable probability the 25 improper argument changed the result of the trial.”
  • “In order to have reversible error, there must be harm as well as error[.]”
  • there must be harm as well as error to warrant reversing the trial court
  • relevancy doubts to be resolved in favor of admitting evidence; trial court exercises discretion in determining whether to admit evidence over a relevancy objection, and appellate court may not reverse unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Moxley v. Moxley

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.