Zaimis v. Sharis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court properly considered parol evidence that was probative of mutual mistake to show the parties’ contractual intent in a reformation case
• no impediment to reformation of a lease because the defendant failed to show that he would be prejudiced
• “A petition for reformation of a written contract will lie where by mistake of the scrivener and by oversight of the parties, the writing does not embody or fully express the real contract of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).