Mowery v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The law does not favor exclusionary rules; they hinder the search for truth.”
• construing OCGA §§ 17-16-21, 17-16-22, and 17-16-23
• exclusionary rules are not favored

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Birdsall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-03-28· cited 8×
• State v. Oliver
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-11· cited 5×
• Ruff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-31· cited 3×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-11-12· cited 1×
• Braswell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-07· cited 1×
• Deiage Hendrix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-11-08
• Daugherty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-21
• David Gaines Gilmore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-10-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilburn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-05-07· cited 51×
• Helmeci v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 29×
• Byrd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-07· cited 6×
• State v. Cooper
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-16· cited 1×