Skip to main content

Byrd v. State

Citations

  • 455 S.E.2d 318
  • 216 Ga. App. 510
  • 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 990
  • 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when a witness’ name is contained in the indictment, a defendant cannot validly contend that he was surprised 3 because he lacked knowledge of such witness
  • issues raised in enumerations but not argued in brief deemed abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Johnson, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.