Moss v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “mere possession ... is not prohibited!!,] ... [t]he gravamen of the offense arises from the possessor’s ‘intent to use’ these ‘common, ordinary’ objects for a criminal purpose specified by statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hagy v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-03-27· cited 19×
• Williams v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-09-04· cited 13×
• Edwards v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-02-17· cited 12×
• Mercer v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-03-23· cited 12×
• Edwards v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-05-27· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Higginbotham v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-10-10· cited 746×
• Woolfolk v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-23· cited 110×
• Burnette v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1953-04-20· cited 92×