Mercer v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “wearing apparel designed to be worn in a particular situation” constituted an “outfit” as envisioned by Code § 18.2-94
• holding that \wearing apparel designed to be worn in a particular situation\ constituted an \outfit\ as envisioned by Code § 18.2-94

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-09-04· cited 13×
• Edwards v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-02-17· cited 12×
• Edwards v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-05-27· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-21· cited 959×
• Coleman v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-09-09· cited 400×
• Long v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-05-02· cited 329×
• Servis v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-05· cited 274×
• Hamilton v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-07-20· cited 264×
• Woolfolk v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-23· cited 110×
• Hancock v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-07-01· cited 98×
• Burnette v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1953-04-20· cited 92×
• Moss v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-01-19· cited 18×
• Herrel v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-12-08· cited 18×
• Nance v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1962-04-23· cited 17×