· 3/26/1986
Moss, Adams & Co. v. Shilling
Citations
- 179 Cal. App. 3d 124
- 224 Cal. Rptr. 456
- 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1380
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiffs claim failed as a matter of law, the use of names on rolodex did not constitute trade secret
- “Antisolicitation covenants are void as unlawful business restraints except where their enforcement is necessary to protect trade secrets.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.