Hill v. Equitable Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment based on the statute of limitations defense where plaintiffs presented reasonable inference that investors would not be on inquiry notice of fraud
• discussing the 2019 amendment to the Rule and factors to apply when considering final approval of a class action settlement
• payments were secured by irrevocable letters of credit such that “if plaintiff defaulted on a payment, the partnership could turn to the bank for payment, and the limited partner may be personally liable to the bank”
• bank owed duty against negligent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).