Mississippi Supreme Court· 8/5/2004
Moses v. Moses
Citations
- 879 So. 2d 1036
- 2004 WL 1753396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, due to the vagueness of the amended final judgment of divorce, the trial court abused its discretion in finding the appellant in contempt
- holding that, due to the vagueness of the amended final judgment of divorce, the trial court abused its discretion in finding the appellant in contempt
- chancellor's finding of a conflict of interest held erroneous, so award of fees based thereon reversed
- “In order to award attorney’s fees in a contempt matter, the trial court must first consider if there was a willful violation of the court’s order.”
- “In order to award attorney’s fees [and court costs] in a contempt matter, the trial court must first consider if there was a willful violation of the court’s order.”
- court reversed contempt judgment, so award of attorney’s fees also reversed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, P.J., Easley and Carlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-04-26· cited 52×
- In Re HamptonMississippi Supreme Court· 2006-01-05· cited 23×
- Ford Motor Co. v. TenninMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 20×
- Clayton Frank Gutierrez v. Trisha GutierrezMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 13×
- Showers v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-11-01· cited 7×
- Rushing v. RushingCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-08-23· cited 4×
- Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-03-17· cited 4×
- Hanshaw v. HanshawCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-12-15· cited 3×
- Linda A. Hampton v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-09-03
- Ford Motor Company, Inc. v. Julia TenninMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-08-01
- King v. PIKE COUNTY NAT. BANKCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2007-03-27
- In Re: Ali M. ShamsiddeenMississippi Supreme Court· 2023-03-09
- Kimberlyn Seals, Felecia Perkins, Esq., Jessica Ayers, Esq. and Derek D. Hopson, Sr., Esq. v. Ernest B. Stanton, IIMississippi Supreme Court· 2022-09-22
- Louise Gombako-Amos v. Corey Rene AmosMississippi Supreme Court· 2026-06-04
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-07-28· cited 352×
- Newell v. HintonMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-01-31· cited 167×
- Tucker v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-08-15· cited 123×
- Carr v. CarrMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-13· cited 96×
- Purvis v. PurvisMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 86×
- Hall v. WoodMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-12-07· cited 56×
- Dunaway v. BusbinMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 51×
- Switzer v. SwitzerMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-12-05· cited 51×
- Wing v. WingMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 47×
- Wood v. WoodMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-10-01· cited 44×
- Ladner v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 36×
- Hooker v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 32×
- Douglas v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-08-15· cited 17×
- Moses v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2004-03-23· cited 16×
- Vockroth v. VockrothMississippi Supreme Court· 1967-07-10· cited 14×
- Aldridge v. ParrMississippi Supreme Court· 1981-04-01· cited 10×
- McCardle v. McCardleCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2004-01-13· cited 8×
- Webb v. WebbMississippi Supreme Court· 1980-12-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.