Skip to main content

Moser v. Frohnmayer

Citations

  • 845 P.2d 1284
  • 315 Or. 372
  • 61 U.S.L.W. 2528
  • 1993 Ore. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Robertson analysis to hold unconstitutional a law regulating commercial telephone solicitation
  • applying the .Ro&erfsore analysis to hold unconstitutional a law regulating commercial telephone solicitation
  • statute regulating use of automatic dialing and announcing devices to solicit purchase of real property, goods, or services held invalid under Article I, section 8
  • statute regulating use of automatic dialing and announcing devices to solicit purchase of real property, goods, or services held invalid under Article I, section 8
  • state failed to show that “restrictions on advertising or commercial solicitations” came within historical exception
  • describing Robertson' s historical exception analysis in several steps

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Moser v. Frohnmayer

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.