Mosely v. Mosely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussed statutory treatment and applied rule there was no revocation by operation of law after determining § 60-407 had not yet taken effect and was, therefore, inapplicable to the situation then before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matter of Estate of O'Donnell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-02-04· cited 15×
• Willard J. Luff v. Ruth K. Luff
  D.C. Circuit· 1966-03-24· cited 10×
• Davis v. Aringe
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-06-29· cited 9×
• Ireland v. Terwilliger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-08-21· cited 3×
• Maynard v. Maynard
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1974-10-29· cited 1×
• Craig v. Craig
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2018-10-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lansing v. Haynes
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1893-03-10· cited 48×
• Bartlett v. Lahr
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1922-06-12· cited 12×
• Pacetti v. Rowlinski
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1929-12-16· cited 9×
• Nenaber v. Nenaber
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1929-06-04· cited 7×
• Reiter v. Carroll
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1946-12-02· cited 6×