Skip to main content
· 6/29/1987

Davis v. Aringe

Citations

  • 731 S.W.2d 210
  • 292 Ark. 549
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]o adopt [the residual legatee’s] argument would require us to read language into [the statute] that simply is not there.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.