Skip to main content

Morton v. Continental Baking Co.

Citations

  • 938 P.2d 271
  • 314 Utah Adv. Rep. 33
  • 1997 Utah LEXIS 32
  • 1997 WL 160093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that \a party's conduct merits sanctions under rule 37 if any of the following circumstances are found:\ (1) wilifulness; (2) bad faith; (3) some fault; or (4) persistent dilatory tactics (emphasis added) (citations omitted)
  • affirming the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's claims under rule 37(b)(2)(C) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure
  • affirming dismissal of action for failure to respond after the trial court granted a motion to compel discovery
  • \A trial judge is given a great deal of latitude in determining the most fair and efficient manner to conduct court business.\
  • “Once the [district] court determines that sanctions are appropriate, the choice of an appropriate discovery sanction is primarily the responsibility of the trial judge.” (quotation simplified)
  • \(Discovery sanctions are warranted if] (1) the party's behavior was willful; (2) the party has acted in bad faith; (8) the court can attribute some fault to the party; or (4) the party has engaged in persistent dilatory tactics tending to frustrate the judicial process.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Stewart, Zimmerman, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.