Morrison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a medical expert’s addendum report indicating that the claimant’s lower back issues were due to a pre[]existing condition[,] after receiving MRIs and additional facts indicating a history of chronic low back pain, was competent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A & J Builders, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-16· cited 100×
• Potere v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-20· cited 31×
• Zuchelli v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-18· cited 12×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-22· cited 327×
• House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-04· cited 260×
• Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-20· cited 79×
• Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-02-11· cited 67×
• Newcomer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 58×
• Dandenault v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-13· cited 11×
• Higgins v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-07-28· cited 10×
• County of Schuylkill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-05· cited 7×